Three AI models debate the best tools — and find common ground
I find it interesting that both Claude and Gemini have Retool in their top positions, but I don't agree with that ranking. While Retool is powerful for internal tools, its niche focus limits its versatility compared to OutSystems and Mendix, which offer broader enterprise solutions. OutSystems and Mendix are well-regarded for their robust ecosystems and scalability, making them superior choices for enterprises seeking extensive features and integrations.
Microsoft Power Apps, featured in both Claude's and Gemini's lists, deserves consideration due to its seamless integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, which is beneficial for businesses already invested in Microsoft products. However, its complexity can be a barrier for non-technical users, which is why I rank it lower.
Appian, on the other hand, excels in business process management, which is critical for organizations looking to streamline operations. Meanwhile, Bubble and Airtable cater well to startups and smaller projects with their user-friendly interfaces.
My updated top 5 will slightly adjust to account for Microsoft Power Apps' integration capabilities:
ChatGPT, your definition of 'low-code' is skewed towards high-cost, enterprise-grade platforms. OutSystems, Mendix, and Appian are complex beasts requiring significant investment and specialized developers – they are not truly low-code for broad adoption. Bubble is fair, but Airtable is a data platform, not an app builder. This misses the essence of accessible, rapid development.
Claude, you've got the right idea with Retool, Appsmith, Power Apps, and Budibase; these excel at internal tool building and developer empowerment. However, ToolJet, while open-source, isn't as mature or universally applicable as Google AppSheet. AppSheet democratizes app creation, letting non-developers build robust, data-driven applications directly from spreadsheets, a crucial capability for business agility. My picks prioritize true low-code accessibility, powerful internal tooling, and broad ecosystem integration.
I see ChatGPT went enterprise-heavy while Gemini and I overlap significantly on internal tools. Let me address the gaps.
ChatGPT's picks: OutSystems and Mendix are solid enterprise platforms, but they're expensive and overkill for most teams. Bubble is consumer-focused for MVPs, not internal tools where low-code shines. Airtable is a database with forms, not a true app builder.
Gemini's picks: We agree on Retool, Appsmith, and Budibase - good. But Google AppSheet at #5? It's limited compared to Power Apps and locked into Google's ecosystem. Power Apps has better enterprise integration and a massive user base.
My position: The real low-code value is in internal tool builders that connect to existing data. Retool dominates this space with the best developer experience. ToolJet is the strongest open-source alternative with self-hosting. Appsmith has momentum and good UI. Budibase offers database+frontend. Power Apps wins on enterprise reach and Microsoft integration.
OutSystems/Mendix serve a different market (full enterprise app dev). Bubble serves another (consumer MVPs). The core low-code category is internal tools.
I see points of contention with both your lists, Gemini and Claude. Claude, you're correct that the core value of low-code is in internal tools, but your dismissal of OutSystems and Mendix as overkill misses the mark for enterprises needing robust ecosystems. These platforms offer extensive scalability and integrations, which are critical for large-scale operations.
Gemini, your focus on accessibility is commendable, but prioritizing Google AppSheet overlooks its limitations in flexibility and integration compared to Power Apps. While AppSheet is user-friendly, it's not as versatile as Microsoft Power Apps, which offers a more comprehensive suite of tools for app development across diverse environments.
Retool deserves its place for its developer-friendly interface, but I still caution against neglecting broader enterprise needs. Appsmith and Budibase are solid choices for their flexibility and open-source benefits, but I would replace ToolJet with Mendix for its proven scalability and enterprise readiness.
Here's my refined take:
ChatGPT, your critique of Google AppSheet's flexibility is fair; Power Apps certainly has broader enterprise integration, making AppSheet less universally applicable for diverse environments.
However, replacing it with Mendix fundamentally misunderstands the 'low-code' ethos. Mendix, like OutSystems, is a high-cost, high-complexity platform that demands specialized developers and significant investment. It's
Gemini's right that Mendix doesn't belong here. ChatGPT, you keep pushing enterprise platforms that cost $50k+ annually and require dedicated teams. That's not low-code's core promise.
The debate has clarified something: we need to distinguish internal tool builders (the sweet spot) from full enterprise platforms. Retool, Appsmith, and Budibase clearly belong in the top tier - we all agree on these three now.
ChatGPT, you've moved Retool to #1 and added Appsmith/Budibase. That's progress. But Mendix at #4 still doesn't fit. Power Apps is the right enterprise choice because it's accessible to citizen developers, not just specialists.
Gemini, dropping AppSheet makes sense given Power Apps' superiority in integration. But you cut off mid-sentence - what's your actual top 5?
Here's where I'm landing: Retool (best DX), Appsmith (open-source with momentum), Microsoft Power Apps (enterprise reach), Budibase (database+UI combo), and ToolJet (self-hosted flexibility). These five cover the spectrum from cloud-native to self-hosted, proprietary to open-source, while staying true to rapid internal tool development.
Claude, I appreciate your clarification on the distinction between internal tool builders and full enterprise platforms. Indeed, the core low-code promise revolves around enabling rapid development without requiring specialized skills. Retool, Appsmith, and Budibase are clearly top contenders in this space due to their flexibility and ease of use.
However, I maintain that Mendix has its place for enterprises needing robust, scalable solutions. While it's true that Mendix and OutSystems are more complex, they offer unparalleled integration and scalability, which are essential for large organizations. That said, for the sake of aligning with the core low-code ethos, I'll reconsider Mendix's position.
ToolJet's open-source nature is appealing, but its maturity and ecosystem are not on par with the others. I agree with Claude and Gemini that Microsoft Power Apps should be prioritized over AppSheet due to its extensive enterprise integration capabilities.
Here's my revised list, balancing internal tool efficiency and broader enterprise needs:
ChatGPT, we're making progress on Retool, Appsmith, Microsoft Power Apps, and Budibase, which are clearly top-tier for internal tools and accessible development. However, your insistence on OutSystems fundamentally misrepresents the low-code promise. OutSystems is a high-cost, high-complexity enterprise platform demanding specialized teams and massive investment – it's the antithesis of accessible, rapid low-code for broad adoption.
Claude is right: ToolJet, while I previously questioned its maturity, fits the internal tool builder category far better. It's open-source, flexible, and aligns with empowering developers for rapid application creation, without the prohibitive cost or complexity of platforms like OutSystems. We must prioritize tools that truly democratize app development.
ChatGPT, you're still clinging to OutSystems, which proves you're not listening. We've established this debate is about accessible low-code for internal tools, not $100k+ enterprise platforms requiring certified developers. OutSystems doesn't belong in this conversation any more than Salesforce or SAP.
Gemini and I now have identical lists: Retool, Appsmith, Microsoft Power Apps, Budibase, ToolJet. This is the right answer.
Retool leads because it has the best developer experience and largest community for internal tools. Appsmith follows as the strongest open-source alternative with excellent UI components. Microsoft Power Apps captures enterprise users already in the Microsoft ecosystem. Budibase uniquely combines database and frontend in one platform. ToolJet rounds it out as the best self-hosted option with strong data source integrations.
These five cover cloud/self-hosted, proprietary/open-source, and technical/citizen developers - all while staying true to rapid, accessible development. Drop OutSystems and join the consensus.
Claude and Gemini, you've provided compelling arguments that highlight the core low-code value in democratizing app development for internal tools. I acknowledge that my previous insistence on OutSystems misses the mark for this debate's focus. Both of you have pointed out that platforms like OutSystems and Mendix, while valuable for large enterprises, diverge from the low-code ethos of accessibility and rapid deployment without extensive resources.
I admit that Retool, Appsmith, Microsoft Power Apps, and Budibase effectively embody the low-code promise. Retool's leading developer experience, Appsmith's open-source strengths, Microsoft Power Apps' enterprise integration, and Budibase's database-frontend combo are indeed ideal for diverse developer needs. Furthermore, ToolJet's self-hosted flexibility aligns well as a cost-effective, open-source option, fitting the internal tool narrative better than the enterprise-heavy OutSystems.
Given this, I'm aligning my list with the consensus, emphasizing low-code accessibility and versatility for internal tool building.